Sitting on the fence

I have a slight tendency to obsess, to fixate, to let things I cannot influence worry me to a state of anxiety that then spills over into other aspects of my life. It rarely comes to much, though. But lately, with the media in Hungary seemingly devoting most of its air time and column inches to immigration issues, my stress levels are rising.

The thought of Hungary building a 175  kilometre fence along its border with Serbia bothers me. It seems like such a massive step backwards. And for a while, as I gave vent to my self-righteous indignation, I ignored the issues that may have driven such a decision. While reacting emotionally is all well and good, I needed to be better informed. So I asked some questions.

Europe is basically divided between the Schengen countries and the non-Schengen countries. Once you’re in the Schengen area, you can travel freely within other Schengen countries. If you travel from a Schengen country to a non-Schengen country you will usually pass through immigration at your point of departure and at your point of entry.

Political asylum is granted to people who live in fear in their home country. Perhaps they are being persecuted for their religious beliefs, sexual orientation, or political views, or are part of a persecuted minority or live in an area affected by civil war or unrest. The EU has agreed that a person can claim asylum at their first port of entry. And Hungary, sitting as it does on the Schengen border, is an attractive entry point.

Hungary would seem to be dealing largely with economic refugees, though, not political ones ‒ a subtle but significant difference. Apparently, only 8‒9% of refugees coming to Hungary are political asylum seekers and it would be a cold heart indeed who would advocate for turning away those fleeing persecution. But what of those moving in search of a better life? This is where I teeter.

Ireland has a history of economic migration. For years, we populated the world, as we searched for better lives. Hungary, too. So many young people today are moving abroad in the hope of finding jobs that will pay them enough to live and to save for the future – two things difficult to do in tandem at home. And are they being turned away?

Is there an argument to be made that those who previously conquered and colonised great swathes of Asia and Africa should be opening their arms to their former subjects? And if so, could Europe sustain the current level of migration from Africa, given the current dismal lack of any sort of cohesive structure?

Were the infrastructure in place to absorb so many others into the system, perhaps I wouldn’t be in the quandary I’m in. But the infrastructure isn’t there. Not yet. Hungary needs to get its own act together first. So what’s bothering me then?

Perhaps it’s the idiocy of it all. How much are the infamous anti-immigration billboards running to? How much did it cost to administer the recent national questionnaire on terrorism? How much will this fence cost? Orban is ‘personally heart-broken’ about every forint he has to spend on the fence. But wouldn’t that money have been better spent on building an infrastructure to cope with this flood of immigrants and working out ways that they could contribute to society from the outset? Am I being too naïve?

Or perhaps it’s the rumblings I’ve heard that neo-Nazi football heads are offering to assist in rounding up refugees at the Serbian border. Or maybe it’s that niggling suspicion being voiced that if these migrants were Christian and white, it would be a different story. That’s the stuff nightmares are made of.

First published in the Budapest Times 3 July 2015

Subscribe to get notified when I publish something new.

4 Responses

  1. Hungary isn’t the only European Country whose attitude to migration raises concerns among open minded people. Orban and others of his ilk will make any issue such as this, into one that will pander to the lowest deeply prejudiced group, and by so doing, it will strengthen their position. Nationalism is their blunt, but wicked and effective instrument.

    1. Migration is a long-established custom, even in Hungary. People have fled persecution and come here for ages, as they have to UK. The trouble today, however, is illegal immigration on an unprecedented scale, and you don’t have to be deeply prejudiced to have qualms about that. There is a certain irony, too, about the way that a number of African and Middle Eastern countries have ejected their former European colonial rulers – and now, dissatisfied or in mortal fear of their compatriots, their people try to come to Europe. And in UK it is open-mindedness that has given rise to, for instance, the growing practice of shari’a law – a large minority feels free to ignore the law of the land because to tell them to do otherwise is proclaimed as politically incorrect and racist behaviour.

    1. I’m not sure when the name USA came into official use, but the original 13 English colonies were more interested in economic gain and territorial expansion. The policy of Manifest Destiny came much later, when people were urgently needed and travel was easier. But a happy medium? That must surely depend on anyone with a legitimate reason for moving to a foreign country being able to request permission, and for the local authorities to be able to grant or refuse it. Law is the basis of civilisation, and those who turn up uninvited by the boatload or smuggle themselves onto trucks, with little or nothing but what they stand up in and expecting to be taken care of, seem to me to fly in the face of civilised behaviour. If they are genuinely in some extreme danger in their home countries – e.g. the Jews in the 1930s – then of course they deserve sympathy, but if their intention is purely economic advantage there is no reason why they cannot ask permission, and come in only if and when the door is opened to them.

Talk to me...

%d bloggers like this:

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information on cookies and GDPR

Cookies and GDPR Compliance

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

General Data Protection Regulation

If you have voluntarily submitted your email address so that you can receive notifications of new posts, please be assured that I don't use your address for anything other than to do just that - and that's done automatically. I might use your address, if I knew how to, but I don't.

This blog does not make money, it does not carry sponsored content, it has no ads for which I receive any form of payment. If I review a place or a restaurant or a book, I don't receive any compensation from anyone. I wish I did, but that would require marketing myself and life is too short. If something changes, I will be sure to let you know.

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe or manage subscription links at the bottom of every email you receive. When you comment on a blog post, Google Analytics tracks where you're posting from. This is stored and I can check my stats to see how many clicks I had today, where people clicked from, and what they clicked on. That's it. Nothing more.

I reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, particularly to other commenters. If you want to have one of your comments deleted, the please get in touch with me at: I'm all for the right to be forgotten so will happily oblige.

So, in a nutshell, if you give me your email address voluntarily to subscribe to new posts or if you opt to subscribe to new comments, then you email is just used for this. Nothing else. Promise.